Special Report
Some outdoor recreation-conservation groups are calling for a revision of the Department of Conservation priorities and targets following a recent National Radio interview with the department’s newly appointed director-general Penny Nelson.
The new director general of DoC has taken over from Lou Sanson, after holding senior roles both with the Ministry for the Environment and the Ministry for Primary Industries.
DoC is responsible for managing one-third of the country’s landmass and some say it’s time for fundamental reform.
DoC head Penny Nelson says there needs to be conversation about what people want conservation to look like.
But some outdoor groups want a “new look”.
Laurie Collins of the Sporting Hunters Outdoor Trust welcomed the opportunity.
“That conversation is much needed,” he says. “In my opinion a change is needed. “Bureaucrats often with ideological bents have had too much influence.”
Tony Orman, spokesman for the Council of Outdoor Recreation Associations, said the organisation in its successive election charters had called for a revision of DoC’s priorities.
“The charter urges re-ordering DoC’s priorities to making its three main priorities conservation, the environment and recreation, instead of its diversion into commercial undertakings,” he says. “Also the name be changed to Department of Conservation and Outdoor Recreation to emphasise its basic function to the public.”
Ecological Reality
Tony Orman says DoC’s culture needs to change to embrace ecological reality.
“DoC must protect and maintain the public’s conservation estate to embrace the evolved 21st century ecosystem and not try to recreate and preserve a hypothetical 500 AD world.”
Dr. Peter Trolove president of the NZ Federation of Freshwater Anglers, an advocacy for trout and salmon and rivers, said it had been disappointing in the light of the deterioration in rivers, to see little or no support from the department for Water Conservation Orders (WCO) designed to give waterways national park type protection.
“WCOs are being undermined due to commercial exploitation for irrigation and power generation. Rivers are a finite resource and habitat not only for trout and salmon but native fish, which should particularly concern DoC.”
Laurie Collins of the Sporting Hunters Outdoor Trust said new DOC director-general Penny Nelson told of audible bird song when living on Kapiti Island. He was critical of the department’s blanketing of public lands with the eco-toxin 1080.
Having worked with the first trials of 1080 and subsequently in department work during his working career, he said 1080 devastated insects and most birds but not all avian species.
“Nectar feeders such as tuis and bell birds – noisy singers – are the least affected. On the other hand, insectivorous bird species, such as bush robins, tomtits, warblers, rifleman and others and predator or scavengers such as falcons, keas and wekas are devastated by the poison. Hearing just tuis and bellbirds sounds good but can give the wrong impression.”
Secondary Poisoning
Each carcass or invertebrate such as worms killed by 1080 remained toxic. The decline in kiwi feeding on worms after 1080 could well be significant.
Laurie Collins said he was concerned to hear Penny Nelson talk of genetic technology to eradicate “destructive invasive species like possums”. Having worked on possums on departmental work and as a possum trapper, he said the “invasive pest” tag was wrong.
“Possums are demonised. They are a herbivore, not a predator and browsing of foliage has been a function of the ecosystem for millions of years.”
Besides possum populations are low.
“It’s so obvious by noting the very few road kills now,” he says. “Nor are they invasive as stated, since possums are slow breeders with one joey a year.”
Laurie Collins said it became a vicious cycle as scare-mongering over possums led to aerial 1080 drops that indiscriminately killed insects and birds.
Possums are a resource with the fur fetching over 20 many times the value of crossbred sheep wool.
Laurie Collins says DoC has become trapped in a time warp, with an anti-introduced phobia and an obsession with eco-poisons such as 1080 and brodifacoum.
The new DoC director general has some formidable challenges to get DoC back on a reality course.
“By talking and very importantly listening and hearing to practical people who understand the bush and the natural world, the new captain might steer DoC back on to a sensible course,” he says.
<c> Dr Peter Trolove – DoC failing to support Water Conservation Orders (WCOs)
I agree DoC needs a thorough and searching over haul. It’s obsession with pests shows it does not understand the food chain and predator-pest relationships.
It carries the pest obsession to such an extreme that it tags herbivore possums as predators. How come Australia where possums are native to, doesn’t have this “problem”?
Remember the 70 million possum population DoC dreamed up? Apparently
it was done by driving highways and counting roadkills. How unscientific and “mickey mouse”. A Landcare scientist told a DOC workshop in 1994 it was bollocks. DoC still continued to use the 70 m figure.
DoC does not run on scientific, factual lines but bureaucratic lines. It is heavily influenced by extreme green groups.
DoC has long had a series of failings.
There was of course Cave Creek, the needless tahr massacre and the revelation DoC sold part of the Ruahine Forest Park (public property) to help the proposal to dam the Tukituki river, an environmentally unsound scheme, the name and blame game by its DG over north Taranaki sika deer , blaming hunters for liberating the deer when the deer had been there since the 1970s by natural spread – to name a few.
Dr. Trolove rightly identifies DoC’s failure to advocate for clean rivers and failure to support the integrity of Water Conservation Order protection for rivers. DoC’s anti-trout stances are bad. Yet DoC is involved managing the Taupo trout fishery.
In recent times, DoC has become inaccessible to the public, with phone calls diverted to main centres, offices closed during working hours etc., DoC is a public service and the public pay the salaries.
Good idea to put DoC under the spotlight; it is so starved for cash it would sell the Southern Alps if it could get away with it.
As I recall, the Ruahine Forest Park land was stewardship land, to be switched for other land thereby enabling the Ruataniwha dam (by a happy coincidence) to go ahead. This deal was done behind closed doors with no public input.
It seems the government intends to change the law for stewardship land; see https://www.doc.govt.nz/news/media-releases/2021-media-releases/government-speeds-up-stewardship-land-reclassification/
Should this be a concern – are they in effect freeing up the system for more secret deals? Or will it make things better?