The Truth about Fish Farms

by Amy P Wilson

Claims that farmed fish are a sustainable and ethical source of protein are fantasy, warns Amy P. Wilson on website “Wicked Leeks”.

Amy P. Wilson, a doctoral candidate and research associate at the University of Johannesburg, South AfricaShe is also an attorney and the first South African to graduate with a Master’s degree in Animal Law.

Let’s cut to the chase here: aquaculture is not a “sustainable” or “ethical” solution to food insecurity, nor is it an “alternative” to terrestrial animal factory farming or to wild-caught fishing.

In fact, these ‘farming’ systems perpetuate some of the worst harms – towards animals, humans, and the environment. And it’s time to unhook ourselves from these misleading claims and our own problematic perceptions. Better yet – to restrict and regulate it, before it’s too late.

For some time now, governments across the world have been pushing for the harvesting and farming of aquatic beings, with the “Blue Economy” punted as the ‘catch of the day’. The rationale? Food security, economic benefits, employment, trade… But what if we’re opening Pandora’s box to release myriad potentially irreversible impacts?

Fast (fish) food

Aquaculture, the farming of aquatic species (plant and animal), is the fastest growing food production sector in the world, having recently surpassed wild-caught fishing. In 2022, global production was at an all-time record high of 130.9 million tonnes. If it is difficult for you to understand what that means in practical terms, you are not alone. 

Much like their counterparts on land, aquacultural animals are not treated “humanely” and are subjected to extremely cruel and harmful practices, meaning various animal welfare issues arise: mutilations, overcrowding, in-fighting, injuries, diseases, parasites, stress, depression, deformities, suffocation, food withdrawal, lack of enrichment, harmful transportation or cruel slaughter – it’s no fun to be a farmed fish. . 

To many, the idea of caring about, or mitigating suffering for aquatic beings is laughable. While many care about their pet dog – or even African elephants in the Savanna – we rarely extend this consideration to aquatic beings (except for perhaps whales, dolphins, and polar bears). 

This is why World Aquatic Animal Day was created to make these issues more visible. Indeed, if we don’t grasp these biases, they’ll be further perpetuated through AI – an increasingly common tool used in aquaculture. 

Sentience and sentiment

Furthermore, aquatic animals are systematically excluded from legal protections. In the US Animal Welfare Act, cold-blooded and farmed animals are excluded, meaning aquaculture animals are firmly outside the protection remit. Even if you don’t connect with the animals impacted there are other reasons not to support aquaculture. 

From an environmental perspective: it causes (water) pollution; release of antibiotics, pesticides and greenhouse gases; habitat loss and destruction; negatively impacts on ecosystems, wildlife (including threatened and endangered species) and biodiversity, (through escapements, invasions, diseases, inter-breeding and otherwise); is extremely resource intensive, and has various other environmental harms. 

If you’re still not convinced, there are potential human health harms to take into account (due to the use of antibiotics, and rise of antimicrobial resistance, contamination, toxicity, microplastics, mercury and rising allergies). Aquaculture is also an extremely high risk job causing many diseases and injuries, and linked with another extremely dangerous job – fishing (not to mention the human rights abuses).

Despite this, there are growing calls to de-regulate the industry in the USA and delegate protections in South Africa. When we should be trying to more strictly regulate the harms and look at this issue from all perspectives. 

But there is some hope – thanks to the tireless work of advocates, push back is happening. Several US states have pre-emptively banned octopus farming, with a federal bill in the works, and states including Washington have prohibited commercial finfish net pen aquaculture.


Footnote: For full article see  https://wickedleeks.riverford.co.uk/opinion/wl-op-edhook-line-sinker-the-real-truth-about-farmed-fish/ 


collab-media-syktLyfonaI-unsplash-scaled.jpg

This entry was posted in Articles. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to The Truth about Fish Farms

  1. Frank Henry says:

    Fish farming is no substitute for proper management of the sea fisheries.
    Government with its quota management system that favours corporate exploiters has failed to manage the fisheries. Shane Jones has his wires crossed in raving about aquaculture.

  2. Tony Orman says:

    I always remember the late Ben Schley, US head of hatcheries telling me on a visit to NZ in the 1970s trout farming issue days that aquaculture was “capital intensive, high risk and only marginally economic.” It’s still the same as shown by King Salmon’s struggles in the Marlborough Sounds which has seen truckloads of “rubbish’ much of it dead, diseased salmon dumped at the local tip.
    The local council initially refused to tell me (a ratepayer) of the amounts dumped so I went to the Ombudsman who rapped MDC’s knuckles and said release the information.
    The amounts were staggering – monthly tonnages ranging from 20 tonnes to 1000 tonnes.

  3. "Fish Bio" says:

    Disease transmission is common in aquaculture particularly in high density operations. Disease outbreaks prompt the use of antibiotics which have adverse effects on the cultivated fish and the surrounding aquatic environment. Escapees from fish farms undermine valuable wild evolved genetics.
    A book well worth reading is “The New Fish” about salmon farming in Norway and other countries and the way corporates manipulate the truth being revealed.

  4. Tim Neville says:

    The parallels with dairying are obvious. Screw the environment and ignore the rights of others, as long as you make a buck. Surely we need a better Ministry of Regulations rather than deregulations when it comes to consumer, environment and public interest? Lets start with removing the artificial pigment in farmed salmon.

  5. Golde says:

    So glad to see the truth about this horrible practice being exposed.I would NEVER buy farmed fish. It disgusting and sad what government allows…..all for the almighty buck…It’s the same government that allowed 1080 poison to be dropped all over NZ all these years. When are NZ people going to vote these idiots out?…You need a NZ “Trump” to make NZ great again!!!

    • John Mulgan says:

      A New Zealand Trump is the last thing we need, though Shane Jones, David Seymour and Chris Bishop all are pursuing the same agenda, and that’s precisely the problem. Trump is a fascist, and so are these guys. And contrary to the old cliche, fascists don’t make the trains run on time, because they replace meritocracy with loyalty oaths and cults of personality.

  6. Postman Pat says:

    Remember the “three p’s” of trout farming: Parasites, Pesticides and Poachers.
    Same goes for salmon farming.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 80 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here