Fast-track legislation: DOC’s OIA refusal was unlawful – Ombudsman

Radio NZ report (abridged)

The Department of Conservation acted unlawfully by refusing an OIA request for information on new fast-track legislation, the Ombudsman has ruled.

Peter Boshier’s decision – which followed a complaint by Forest and Bird – found the Department of Conservation was both unlawful and unreasonable in its refusal to provide copies of its advice to ministers regarding the proposed Fast-track Approvals Bill.

The bill in its current form would see an unprecedented amount of power  placed in the hands of the Ministers for Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Development – Chris Bishop, Simeon Brown and Shane Jones – who would have the final say on whether projects go ahead, with fast-tracked projects able to sidestep rules in existing legislation, and projects already rejected by courts able to get the go-ahead.

Environmental advocates have called it a “war on nature”, and legal experts have warned it would open the ministers up to accusations of bias and conflicts of interest.

On 8 March, Forest and Bird requested a copy of advice provided by the department to ministers regarding the Fast-track Approvals Bill, which the department refused.

Its reasoning fell under section 18(d) of the Official Information Act 1982: “That the information requested is or will soon be publicly available”.

But according to the Ombudsman: “I have formed the final opinion that the Department’s decision was not lawful because there was not, at the time, a sufficiently developed proposal to release all the information that had been requested.

P1010406.jpeg

This entry was posted in Articles. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Fast-track legislation: DOC’s OIA refusal was unlawful – Ombudsman

  1. Frank Henry says:

    I don’t know what goes through the minds of DOC bureaucrats but they need reminding and have instilled in them a sense of duty to the public who after all, pay their salaries plus that the function is in the very name, public service.

  2. Tony Orman says:

    I had an instance in Marlborough where through a Marlborough District councillor I tried to get information on the tonnages of dead – probably diseased – salmon being dumped at the local refuse transfer station by a salmon farming operation in the Marlborough Sounds. A bureaucrats responded that under the OIA he would not release the information on the grounds of “commercial sensitivity.”
    “Commercial sensitivity” is a nonsensical, weasel word phrase. I went to the Ombudsman who after investigation told the council it had to release the information.
    Now I get monthly figures and the tonnages dumped are astounding.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 80 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here